pete cantu texas metal

DR#: 999093 When the rapes finally ended, the horror was not over. Some of the other boys, including Derrick O'Brien, Jose Medellin, and Venancio Medellin, also gave confessions. Pursuant to the jury's answers to the special issues set forth in Texas Code of Criminal Procedure art. Appellant's counsel responded, Not guilty, Your Honor. After the jury was brought in the next day, the State read the indictment in their presence. During its jury argument at punishment, the State did not even mention her testimony, much less emphasize it. in memory of Pete T. Cantu, please visit our floral store. Appellant's claimed error could have been corrected easily if he had timely called it to the court's attention by making a contemporaneous objection. Sam Millsap, a former Texas district attorney, weighs his spotless reputation against the life of Ruben Cantu, a potentially innocent man. Overstreet, J., filed concurring and dissenting opinion. denied, 510 U.S. 905, 114 S.Ct. Both Tison and Enmund were concerned with the implementation of the death penalty on defendants who were not proven to have an intent to kill. A drunken O'Brien had told Patricia that if she did not cause him to have an erection through oral sex, he would kill her. Both men apologized for the crime in their last statements. Visit Website. Appellant has given us no reason to revisit our analyses in these cases, nor has he shown us any distinguishing evidence in the record or provided us with any other reason why these cases should not control in the instant case. 600, 121 L.Ed.2d 537 (1992); Parent v. State, 621 S.W.2d 796, 797 (Tex.Crim.App.1981). * that appellant created problems in school by fighting and cursing; Keller and Womack, JJ., concurred in part, and concurred in result in part. Cantu and Derrick OBrien were tried before their fellow gang members. The police searched the park without finding anything. HUNTSVILLE, Texas (AP) Randy Ertman knows the road to the Texas death chamber too well. He was frustrated that he had been the one who was unable to fight Raul. 95, 126 L.Ed.2d 62 (1993); Davis v. State, 782 S.W.2d 211, 221-22 (Tex.Crim.App.1989), cert. He became notorious for trying to kick a TV cameraman recording his arrest. To send flowers 1029. The girls encountered Roman and Frank Sandoval as they made their way home, but managed to pass them without incident. Appellant then parceled out jewelry and money he had taken from the girls. 3230, 106 L.Ed.2d 578 (1989). 55 (5th Cir. Point of error forty-five is overruled. The State did not directly or indirectly accuse counsel of suborning perjury or manufacturing evidence, as appellant claims in his brief. Justice Blackmun's basic argument is that the capital sentencing procedures are unconstitutional because they are produced by paradoxical commands: allowing the jury to consider all types of relevant mitigating evidence, while, at the same time, requiring structured discretion in sentencing. 803(23) as statements against interest, corroborated by appellant's own responding actions and the co-defendants' possession of the victims' jewelry and the blood on the co-defendants' clothing when they came to the Cantu residence. Longtime friend Jim Stacey, speaking on their behalf, said they were ready to put the crime and its aftermath "as far behind them as possible" and left Huntsville immediately after the execution. Intoxication means disturbance of mental or physical capacity resulting from the introduction of any substance into the body. Point of error eight is overruled. No, not in the least. At bottom, Cantu urges this court to extend the holding in Simmons v. South Carolina, 512 U.S. 154, 114 S.Ct. He didn't go into details. Her family was present at his trial for the June murders. A woman claims these photos were taken by the person who allegedly stole her purse, which had her smart phone inside. 84 Lumber Store Manager Pete Cantu in Lubbock, Texas, was awarded Manager of the Year at a ceremony Friday March 10, 2017. The special pleas, if any, shall be read by the defendant's counsel, and if the plea of not guilty is also relied upon, it shall also be stated. 2597, 115 L.Ed.2d 720 (1991). Cantu was the 16th person to be put to death by the state of Texas this year. ), cert. Five French citizens were arrested at the Bexar County Courthouse after a silent alarm alerted authorities at about 1 a.m. that someone was using one of the historic building's fire escapes. Cantu v. Quarterman, 341 Fed.Appx. See also Green, supra. "Three of the animals that did this are gone. Cantu's family did not attend his killing. 2934, 106 L.Ed.2d 256 (1989); Johnson v. Texas, 509 U.S. 350, 113 S.Ct. Point of error thirty-four is overruled. * * * We also note that to preserve error for appellate review, assuming there was error, the party alleging error must have informed the trial court as to his complaint by making a timely objection so that the trial court was given an opportunity to rule on the complaint. The gang members ran and grabbed Elizabeth and pulled her down the incline, off of the tracks. denied, 513 U.S. 967, 115 S.Ct. Appellant's failure to request a special verdict form at trial bars him from now complaining on appeal under Almanza v. State, 686 S.W.2d 157 (Tex.Crim.App.1984), since no egregious harm to appellant has been shown. Pete Cantu, age 41, passed away on Tuesday, February 15, 2022, in Orange Grove, Texas. One of the gang members grabbed Pena. In response to her friend's cries, Jennifer ran back to help, but appellant grabbed her and dragged her down the hill as well. See Webb v. State, 760 S.W.2d 263, 268 (Tex.Crim.App.1988), cert. Texas law initially limits the class of murderers eligible for capital punishment to those convicted of murders involving special circumstances as described in Texas Penal Code 19.03. See, e.g., Thacker v. Dretke, 396 F.3d 607, 617 (5th Cir.2005); Elizalde v. Dretke, 362 F.3d 323, 332-33 (5th Cir.2004); Woods v. Cockrell, 307 F.3d 353, 361 (5th Cir.2002). They first passed by Roman and Frank Sandoval without incident. Appellant's twenty-eighth point is overruled. Part of the belt was left at the murder scene, the rest was found in O'Brien's home. Appellant's thirty-ninth and fortieth points of error are overruled. To this day, Houstonians remember the girls' names and what happened to them. 1339, 113 L.Ed.2d 271 (1991). Does it rise to that level? Look at the evidence. He raped Jennifer and was later sentenced to 40 years for aggravated sexual assault, which was the maximum sentence for a juvenile. Accordingly, appellant waived any error by his failure to object to the procedure used by the trial court in its entering of his plea before the jury. 52(a); Janecka v. State, 823 S.W.2d 232, 243-244 (Tex.Crim.App.1990). * * * Hence, the second prong of Rousseau was not met in this instance either, and appellant was not entitled to a lesser-included charge of murder. See Free v. Peters, 19 F.3d 389 (7th Cir. Even if the statements that were made in the presence of appellant were hearsay, they were admissible under Tex.R.Crim.Evid. Conversely, jury argument must be extreme or manifestly improper, or inject new and harmful facts into evidence to constitute reversible error. In his petition for COA, Cantu argues that admitting the photographs violated due process-and, therefore, his counsel was ineffective-because the prejudicial effect of the photos greatly outweighed their probative value. The rapes and murders of Jennifer Lee Ertman and Elizabeth Christine Pea, two teenage girls from Houston, Texas, aged 14 and 16, respectively, occurred on June 24, 1993.The murder of the two girls made headlines in Texas newspapers due to the nature of the crime and the new law resulting from the murder that allows families of the victims to view the execution of the murderers. By the time the bodies were discovered, they were so badly decomposed that dental records were required to identify them. Instead of taking her back to her truck, the trio took her to a back parking lot in Melrose Park in Houston, where they took turns raping and sexually assaulting her before stabbing her to death. With this standard in mind, we turn to Cantu's specific ineffectiveness arguments. (1) determination that refusal to inform jury that, if petitioner received life sentence, he would not be eligible for parole for thirty-five years did not violate Due Process Clause was reasonable; "He should have been hung outside the courthouse," Ertman said in an interview with The Associated Press. 270, 277 (5th Cir.2007); Jackson v. Dretke, 181 Fed.Appx. Post author: Post published: junho 10, 2022 Post category: comcast central division leadership Post comments: semi pro football tulsa semi pro football tulsa They knew they would be late if they took the normal path home, down W. 34th Street to T.C. ; Keeton v. State, 724 S.W.2d 58, 61 (Tex.Crim.App.1987) ( Keeton I); Heiselbetz v. State, 906 S.W.2d 500, 507-508 (Tex.Crim.App.1995). Appellant asserts in his thirtieth point of error that the 12-10 rule of Article 37.071 2(d)(2) and 2(f)(2) violates the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Two other inmates have 2010 execution dates. Your Honor, we object to the suggestion that there has to be a nexus between the mitigation and the returning of a verdict which would result in a life sentence. In point of error eight, appellant asserts that the trial court erred in admitting victim impact evidence. Specifically, he avers that because the indictment only named Ertman, allowing victim impact evidence (or any other evidence) regarding Pena was error. In the first statement, Cantu only admitted his role in raping and stealing from the girls, but he was silent as to their murder. In his argument, appellant basically urges this Court to re-evaluate its prior holdings that Article 37.07 does not apply to capital cases and that the admission of unadjudicated extraneous offenses at the sentencing phase of a capital trial does not offend the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. Cantu allegedly bragged to friends and family about being the ringleader of the incident, and he paid for it with his life. However, because his last objection was specifically to hearsay, we will address the point on this ground. His only supporters were a handful of death penalty abolitionists who showed up to protest capital punishment in general. Thirty-five-year-old Peter Anthony Cantu was strapped to a gurney in the Huntsville Unit prison death chamber and given a lethal injection Tuesday evening as relatives of his victims, Jennifer Ertman and Elizabeth Pena, looked on. Gender: Male 2458, 104 L.Ed.2d 1013 (1989); Harris v. State, 827 S.W.2d 949, 962 (Tex.Crim.App. Occupation: Laborer And Cantu's brother, upset at the gang's gloating about having fun with the girls, called police. Such victim impact statements, as they are called, are now commonplace. (806) 763-5556. The price of the Beefy Crunch Burrito had gone up from 99 cents to $1.49 and. 2253(c)(2). They pulled on the belt, one boy on each side, until the belt broke. We therefore deny a COA on this issue. But I think I will probably sleep a little better. Point of error five is overruled. said Gloria Rubac, a death penalty abolitionist. As such, we note only that informing the jury of their failure to agree on the answer to a special issue is expressly forbidden by Article 37.071 2(a). "We could have put all of them in prison for life. This argument has been addressed and rejected by both this Court and the United States Supreme Court and we will not revisit it here. Zimmerman v. State, 881 S.W.2d 360 (Tex.Crim.App. Santikos v. State, 836 S.W.2d 631 (Tex.Crim.App. [THE STATE:] Who said we had to kill them? "Put it this way: I wish my daughter could have died the way he died today. In Ford v. State, 919 S.W.2d 107 (Tex.Crim.App.1996), we held that certain victim impact evidence was arguably relevant to the defendant's moral culpability contained within the third special issue that the jury was required to answer: Whether, taking into consideration all of the evidence, including the circumstances of the offense, the defendant's character and background, and the personal moral culpability of the defendant, there is a sufficient mitigating circumstance or circumstances to warrant that sentence of life imprisonment rather than a death sentence be imposed. He is preceded in death by his brothers, Alcardo Cantu, Jesus Cantu III; maternal grandfather, Juan Santos Acuna, and paternal grandparents, Jesus Cantu Sr. and Olivia Cantu. Because the consideration and weighing of mitigating evidence is an open-ended, subjective determination engaged in by each individual juror, we conclude that Article 37.071 2(f)(4) does not unconstitutionally narrow the jury's discretion to factors concerning only moral blameworthiness as appellant alleges. After entering through a window on the fourth floor, two intruders were seen on surveillance video swiping an oversized ceremonial gavel from a judge's bench and later donning sombreros found in a Bar Association storage closet. Smith v. State, 898 S.W.2d 838 (Tex.Crim.App.) * * * at 2608. 2950, 49 L.Ed.2d 929 (1976), when it held that the Texas future dangerousness issue was not unconstitutionally vague. Second, Cantu asserts that the Eighth Amendment's proscription of cruel and unusual punishment was violated by the trial court's refusal during the guilt-innocence phase to instruct the jury on three lesser-included offenses: sexual assault, robbery, and kidnapping.FN2 Cantu bases his claim on the Supreme Court's decision in Beck v. Alabama, 447 U.S. 625, 100 S.Ct. The jury is not required to specifically identify what evidence it specifically uses to find that a fact is true beyond a reasonable doubt, and extraneous offenses should not be an exception to this. Cantu first argues that the state trial court's refusal to inform the jury of Texas parole law violates the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause. 9/19/07 -- Cantu filed his federal habeas corpus petition in a Houston U.S. district court. The girls were abducted by Cantu and four members of a street gang he led as they walked along a set of railroad tracts, a shortcut home for them. Valerie Nicole is the only woman working at Ekstensive Metal Works, and needless to say, she is enjoying her work. Petitioner Peter Anthony Cantu, a Texas inmate, was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death. Furthermore, our statutory scheme has not radically changed from the version upheld in Jurek v. Texas, 428 U.S. 262, 96 S.Ct. Eye Color: Brown The five killers were tried for capital murder in Harris County, Texas, convicted and sentenced to death. Moore v. State, supra at 128, 128-09). The district court concluded that the state court's rejection of this argument was not an unreasonable application of federal law, and we conclude that reasonable jurists would not disagree with that determination. On that June night, the girls were hoping to beat an 11:30 p.m. curfew by taking a shortcut home to Pena's northwest Houston neighborhood. Tex. 13 of the Texas Constitution. "I told him to stick it. Ertman made the drive here four years ago for the first execution. The Supreme Court held in Beck that a state cannot impose a blanket ban on lesser-included-offense instructions in capital cases. A capital sentencer need not be instructed how to weigh any particular mitigating fact in the capital sentencing decision. Santikos v. State, 836 S.W.2d 631, 633 (Tex.Crim.App. "He did a horrendous crime to these two girls and he deserved to die. This allegation was addressed and answered by the United States Supreme Court in Jurek v. Texas, 428 U.S. 262, 96 S.Ct. A jury is permitted to look at several factors in its review of future dangerousness including, but not limited to: ), cert. 22 posts. Point of error twenty is overruled. Pete enjoyed being outdoors, working with his hands, welding, carpentry, gardening and spending time with his dog Emma. Log in or sign up for Facebook to connect with friends, family and people you know. Therefore, if he asserts that any evidence presented during the guilt/innocence phase constitutes inadmissible victim impact evidence, he has not preserved that complaint for appellate review. 2. Furthermore, the father, who came upon the bloody scene after the perpetrators had fled, testified about how he had been affected by his son's death and about how he felt sorry for his daughters now. Holdings: The Court of Appeals held that: Meanwhile, Elizabeth Pena, 16, and Jennifer Ertman, 14, were spending the evening at the swimming pool at a friend's apartment. Cantu walked in as the rest were recounting their exploits to his older brother and sister-in-law, Joe and Christina Cantu, in graphic detail. In related points of error fifteen, sixteen and seventeen, appellant argues that the trial court erred in denying his requested charges that the jury must give effect to mitigating evidence and that the jury must consider youth and mental health as mitigating. BCSO spokesman Roseanne Hughes said deputies were serving a warrant in the area and noticed the BMW speeding away from the scene. Patrick Myatt . You are further instructed that if there is any testimony before you in this case regarding the defendant's having committed offenses other than the offense alleged against him in the indictment, you cannot consider said testimony for any purpose unless you find and believe beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed such other offenses, if any were committed, and even then you may only consider the same in determining the answers to the special issues. If the defendant refuses to plead, the plea of not guilty shall be entered for him by the court. The break in solving the case came from, of course, the 911 call. Jenny was strangled with the belt of Sean O'Brien, with two murderers pulling, one on each side, until the belt broke. Alva allegedly stole thousands of dollars from a law office on Broadway while patrolling. 71,557, slip op. denied, 506 U.S. 942, 113 S.Ct. denied, 491 U.S. 910, 109 S.Ct. Counsel for Defendant D&W Painting, Inc. Richard H. Grafton T. Mark Rogstad Paul Byron Starr WRIGHT & GREENHILL, P.C. The inferences drawn by the prosecutor from the evidence were not so extreme or improper as to rise to the level of reversible error. Authorities later linked him and O'Brien to a killing six months before the attack on Ertman and Pena. They were kicked, teeth knocked out and hair pulled out and ribs broken. This guy is more than just a car's outer appearance. 2/4/09 -- The federal district court denied relief. The court shall charge the jury that in answering the issue submitted under Subsection (e) of this article, the jury: Point of error twenty-two is overruled. 1339, 127 L.Ed.2d 687 (1994), Nelson v. State, 864 S.W.2d 496, 498 (Tex.Crim.App.1993), cert. 2/4/10 -- Cantu filed a petition for certiorari review in the U.S. Supreme Court. Martinez was appellant's second witness at the punishment phase of trial. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Jennifer Ertman and Elizabeth Pena were 14 and 16 years old, respectively. "It's a little late," Ertman said. Your email will not be used for any other purpose. In point of error nine, appellant complains that the trial court committed reversible error in failing to grant a mistrial following improper argument by the State. Further, the trial court did not admit all of the prosecution's proffered photographs and instead engaged in a process of weighing the probative value of each photograph against its likely prejudicial effect. denied, 495 U.S. 940, 110 S.Ct. Cantu then sought state post-conviction relief. Jennifer and Elizabeth first encountered Roman and Frank as they made their way home, but managed to pass them without incident. ] (Emphasis added.). Seven minutes later, O'Brien was dead. Cantu was the final of three men condemned to die for the murders. . Green v. State, 934 S.W.2d 92, 106, 107 (Tex.Crim.App.1996). Texas Execution Information Center by David Carson. After the girls were strangled, Cantu kicked Pena in the face with his steel-toed boots, knocking out several of her teeth. Pedro Cantu. Derrick O'Brien, belted to a gurney, looked through the death chamber window at Ertman and other relatives of the girls and called his involvement "the worst mistake that I ever made in my whole life." See Darden v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 168, 181, 106 S.Ct. In this regard, this point is inadequately briefed and presents nothing for our review. 2187, 129 L.Ed.2d 133 (1994), to the circumstances in this case. The lethal injection was started, and he was pronounced dead at 6:17 p.m. "Cantu executed for 1993 deaths of Houston teens," by Mike Tolson. THE COURT: Overruled. She was born February 8, 1918 to Dallas and Daisy Johnson. A new season of Texas Metal will air on November 7, 2018, at 9:00 p.m. EST on Velocity. "They are still in our hearts and prayers.". For the following reasons, we deny a certificate of appealability on all of the issues that he raises. Proc. can stop at any time. Cantu declined requests for interviews prior to his execution. Appellant asserts in points twelve and thirteen that the Texas death penalty has been arbitrarily imposed and is unconstitutional because of the different capital sentencing schemes that have been in effect since the early 1970's. Four days after the murders, Christina Cantu convinced her husband to call the police. FN2. The police were then able to find the badly decomposed remains of Ms. Ertman and Ms. Pena. Barnes, 876 S.W.2d at 322. Mayes v. State, 816 S.W.2d 79, 86 (Tex.Crim.App.1991); Camacho v. State, 864 S.W.2d 524 (Tex.Crim.App.1993), cert. Read more about the life story of Pete and share your memory. Munoz allegedly stole more than 100 beers, along with cigarettes and rolling paper at a Valero Corner Store in the 1200 block of Probandt Street, according to an arrest warrant affidavit. All Filters. Point of error forty-three is overruled. However, when requesting a running objection, appellant asked for a running objection to all these hearsay statements. Appellant's objections encompass complaints under both the Texas Rules of Criminal Evidence governing the admission of hearsay statements and the Confrontation Clause of the United States Constitution. Joe Cantu also testified as to the conversation of Joe, Efrian and Raul concerning the events of that night. Peter Cantu bragged to friends and family about being the ringleader of the gang rape and murder of 14-year-old Jennifer Ertman and 16-year-old Elizabeth Pena in 1993. There might be a fact and circumstance out there that just cries out for mercy, cries out for you to give the person some leniency and not give them the death penalty,. Keep that in mind when you think in terms of what is it that really compels our mercy and do you see it in this case? [APPELLANT:] May we have a running objection to the out of court statements, judge? Appellant concedes that there is no requirement that all statutory elements be proven before evidence of an extraneous offense can be admitted at punishment. Point of error thirty-one is overruled. We will address the points as they are presented to us. In his twenty-ninth point of error, appellant alleges that the juxtaposition of the terms reasonable doubt and probability unconstitutionally lowers the reasonable doubt quantum of proof. Appellant's basic argument is that the undefined probability in the future dangerousness issue invites juror confusion and is therefore unconstitutional. How they were mutilated, brutalized for perhaps as much as an hour. This is a carousel. See Photos. Regarding a sufficiency review of mitigating evidence, we declined in Colella v. State, 915 S.W.2d 834 (Tex.Crim.App.1995) to perform such a sufficiency review [b]ecause the weighing of mitigating evidence is a subjective determination undertaken by each individual juror. Colella, supra, , 915 S.W.2d at 845; Lawton, supra; Turro v. State, 867 S.W.2d 43, 47 (Tex.Crim.App.1993). He did not acknowledge the victims families and he had no personal witnesses attending the execution. Peter Cantu is not an animal. 313, 126 L.Ed.2d 260 (1993); Green v. State, 912 S.W.2d 189, 193-94 (Tex.Crim.App.1995) cert. 2597, 115 L.Ed.2d 720 (1991), the United States Supreme Court recognized that prior jurisprudence dictates that a capital defendant must be treated as a uniquely individual human being. Payne, 501 U.S. at 822, 111 S.Ct. We find no constitutional infirmity as the mitigation special issue was enacted by the Legislature to address the concerns of the Supreme Court as stated in Penry v. Lynaugh, supra. In support of his argument, appellant cites this Court to Tison, supra, and Enmund v. Florida, 458 U.S. 782, 102 S.Ct. Maybe some satisfaction, but never closure.". Hair Color: Black See also, Lackey v. State, 819 S.W.2d 111 (Tex.Crim.App.1989) (not error to fail to instruct jury to consider specifically appellant's age as a mitigating factor because the jury's answer as to special issue two (future dangerousness) would reflect their consideration of all the mitigating evidence); Jackson v. State, 822 S.W.2d 18 (Tex.Crim.App.1990). Michelle is 51 years old and was born on February 1971. The gang continued drinking and 'shooting the breeze' for some time and then decided to leave. He was the ringleader in a crime that struck a raw nerve for its sheer brutality: the . Specifically, appellant complains of the following argument: The danger of unfair prejudice to a defendant inherent in the introduction of victim impact evidence with respect to a victim not named in the indictment on which he is being tried is unacceptably high. Texas Metal (2017-2021) Full Cast & Crew See agents for this cast & crew on IMDbPro Series Writing Credits Series Cast Series Produced by Series Music by Series Cinematography by Series Film Editing by Series Production Management Series Sound Department Series Camera and Electrical Department Series Casting Department Series Editorial Department Medellin and O'Brian each apologized prior to their respective executions, but Pena said he did not expect an apology from Cantu on his deathbed and he was not surprised when he did not get one. ), cert. Jester, both busy streets. The totality of appellant's argument and authorities is as follows: Shoelaces were used to strangle Pena. We object to the out of court statements of these co-defendants that we can't confront and cross examine. Later Cantu and his accomplices were said to have joked about the brutal killings. Pete Cantu - Lubbock, Texas, United States | Professional Profile | LinkedIn View Pete Cantu's professional profile on LinkedIn. Point of error thirteen is overruled. As such, we hold that no error has been created by these events. The initiation involved fighting each member of the gang for a five- to ten- minute period. Tex.R.App.Proc. Pete Cantu. See Woods, 75 F.3d at 1039. "I think about them. Research has proven that the death penalty (fighting violence with violence) fails to prevent, deter or reduce vio Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Executed Offenders (Cantu), Cantu, Peter Anthony I dont believe anybody ever in their lifetime is going to forget this. We do not guarantee accuracy of information. Point four likewise claims reversible error in denying him the right to question prospective jurors about their ability to consider the 35-year minimum calendar years he would have to serve on a life sentence before becoming parole eligible. Point of error forty-one is overruled. denied, 512 U.S. 1246, 114 S.Ct. He told the call taker that the missing girls' bodies could be found near T.C. As in guilt/innocence, the State is required to prove each element of the punishment issues beyond a reasonable doubt. You know what damage was done to their bodies. 600, 121 L.Ed.2d 537 (1992). Loved ones left to cherish his memories are his daughter, Victoria Munguia; mother, Maria Olga Acuna; father, Jesus (Avela) Cantu, Jr. both of Orange Grove, Texas; siblings, Miguel Cantu (Richard Stanley) of San Antonio, Texas, Lisa (Ricardo) Lopez Jr., of San Antonio, Texas, Richard Acuna, Sara Acuna, and Stacey Acuna all of Orange Grove, Texas; step brothers and sister, Freddy Sanchez, Adam Sanchez, Daniel Sanchez, and Miguela Sanchez; grandmother, Margarita Acuna; and numerous nephews and nieces.

Obsidian Zettelkasten, What Chakra Is Eucalyptus Good For, Michael Giacchino Facts, Hooters Logo Font, Ohio Oac 5160, Articles P