decision sent to author nature communications

See How does the Article Transfer Service work for authors? 2015;136(6):136977. Decision Summary. For some journals, the status may include the decision term e.g. 2008;23(7):3513. . We then analysed the uptake by gender for the entire portfolio, as we were interested in finding any gender-related patterns. (Courtesy of Clarivate Analytics), The Article Influence Score determines the average influence of a journal's articles over the first five years after publication. Article-level metrics are also available on each article page, allowing readers to track the reach of individual papers. We investigated the relationship between review type and institutional prestige (as measured by the institution groups) by testing the null hypothesis that the review type is independent from prestige. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000001820, Newcombe NS, Bouton ME. For more information, please visit Press J to jump to the feed. Another report found that the authors of submissions to the American Journal of Public Health were in fact recognizable in around half of the cases [3]. This can be due to quality or referee bias. We did not find a significant association between OTR and gender (Pearsons chi-square test results: 2=0.015641, df=1, p value=0.9005). . Author uptake for double-blind submissions was 12% (12,631 out of 106,373). In order to measure any quality effect, we tested the null hypothesis that the populations (institution group 1, 2, and 3) have the same proportion of accepted manuscripts for DBPR manuscripts with a test for equality of proportions (proportion of accepted manuscripts 0.37 for group 1, 0.31 for group 2, and 0.23 for group 3). captcha. We employed descriptive statistics for data exploration, and we tested our hypotheses using Pearsons chi-square and binomial tests. Proc Natl Acad Sci. One reviewer admitted the specific field wasn't in his/hers expertise. 9.3 weeks. Katz DS, Proto AV, Olmsted WW. manuscripts originally submitted to a journal and subsequently transferred to another journal which was deemed a better fit by the editor. 2nd ed. 2007;18(2):MR000016. manuscript under consideration 40editor decision started. Data are collected annually for full calendar years. There is a small but significant association between institution group and acceptance (Pearsons chi-square test results: 2=49.651, df=3, p value <0.001, Cramers V=0.049). The full model has a pseudo R2 of 0.05, and the binned plot of the models residuals against the expected values also shows a poor fit. If you still have questions about what In Review can do for you or how it works, read our FAQ. We decided to exclude the gender values NA and we observed a significant but very small difference in the acceptance rate by gender (Pearsons chi-square test of independence: 2=3.9364, df=1, p value=0.047; Cramers V=0.015), leading us to conclude that manuscripts by female corresponding authors are slightly less likely to be accepted. Let us suggest an alternative journal within our esteemed publishing portfolio for resubmitting your manuscript (and any reviewer comments) for fast, effortless publication. Chung KC, Shauver MJ, Malay S, Zhong L, Weinstein A, Rohrich RJ. This process left 13,542 manuscripts without a normalised name; for the rest of the manuscripts, normalised institution names and countries were found, which resulted in 5029 unique institution names. Median values and the graphed interval (minimum and maximum values), are indicated. JAMA. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript. Next, we investigated the relation between OTR rates, review model, and institution group (Table10) to detect any bias. by | May 28, 2022 | vga white light on asus motherboard | anskan om utbyte av utlndskt krkort | May 28, 2022 | vga white light on asus motherboard | anskan om utbyte av utlndskt krkort After reviewing the reports, you can proceed to making decisions on papers. Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content: Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. 0000002247 00000 n isolera golv plintgrund waiting to send decision to author nature. (major revision)6 (revision)3 (Covid-19) 3. Help us improve this article with your feedback. Nature. If you have previously submitted a paper to a Nature Portfolio journal and would like an update on the status of your submission, please login to the manuscript tracking account for the . Uses field-specific PhD-qualified editors, editing to quality standards set by Nature Research. We investigated the proportion of OTR papers (OTR rate) under both peer review models to see if there were any differences related to gender or institution. On the other hand, an analysis of the Evolution of Language (EvoLang 11) conference papers found that female authors received higher rankings under DBPR [13]. In the post-review analysis, we found that DBPR papers that are sent to review have an acceptance rate that is significantly lower than that of SBPR papers. We note here that, in recent years, trends in scholarly publishing have emerged that strongly propose transparent, or open, peer review as a model that could potentially improve the quality and robustness of the peer review process [18]. Nature CommunicationsNatureNature CommunicationsPeer-review Nature Communicationstransparent peer-reviewget Nature Communicationsget50% Nature Communicaitons The aims of this study are to analyse the demographics of corresponding authors choosing double-blind peer review and to identify differences in the editorial outcome of manuscripts depending on their review model. The difference, however, is very small. An Editor has been assigned, and has not yet taken an action that triggers some other status. . Download MP3 / 387 KB. Impact of interventions to improve the quality of peer review of biomedical journals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Article Sorry we couldn't be helpful. Most journals have online submission systems, which have definitely made it easier and quicker for authors to submit their manuscripts. If you have submitted your manuscript to an Editorial Manager journal but you have not yet received a final decision, you can check its status online. The status changed to "Manuscript under editorial consideration" last night without it changing to "Editor decision started" like in other examples. Journal-integrated preprint sharing from Springer Nature and Research Square. The dataset contains both direct submissions and transfers, i.e. . We have analysed a large dataset of submissions to 25 Nature journals over a period of 2years by review model and in dependence of characteristics of the corresponding author. These records are excluded from the analysis, resulting in a dataset of 128,454 records, of which 20,406 (16%) were submitted to Nature, 65,234 (51%) to the 23 sister journals, and 42,814 (33%) to Nature Communications. On this page you will find a suite of citation-based metrics for Nature Communications which provides an overview of this journal. Any pending input will be lost. 2.3 Procedures Communications Arising submissions that meet Nature's initial selection criteria are sent to the authors of the original paper for a response, and the exchange to independent referees. We would like to thank Michelle Samarasinghe for the help in collecting the data from the manuscript tracking system and Sowmya Swaminathan for the comments on the study and feedback on the manuscript draft. The full model has a pseudo R2 of 0.06, which means that the model only represents a 6% improvement over simply guessing the most frequent outcome, or in other words, the model is not powerful enough to predict the uptake of DB with high reliability. Nature Communications is an open access, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to publishing high-quality research in all areas of the biological, physical, chemical and Earth sciences. We would like to have the manuscript considered for publication in Pathobiology. Concerning the institutions, we defined four categories according to their THE ranks and used these as a proxy for prestige: category 1 includes institutions with THE rank between 1 and 10 (corresponding to 7167 manuscripts, 6% of all manuscripts), category 2 is for THE ranks between 11 and 100 (25,345 manuscripts, 20% of all manuscripts), category 3 for THE ranks above 100 (38,772 manuscripts, 30% of all manuscripts), and category 4 for non-ranked institutions (57,170 manuscripts, or 45% of all manuscripts). Carlsson F, Lfgren , Sterner T. Discrimination in scientific review: a natural field experiment on blind versus non-blind reviews. We understand that you have not received any journal email. Search. 2012;114(2):50019. Locate submission instructions for a Springer journal, Submit a manuscript with your ORCID number, Submit a Nature Portfolio manuscript for Open Access publishing, Submit multimedia files to be published online with your article. bounded rationality . Both authors designed the study and contributed equally to the Results section. These reviewers then need sufficient time to conduct a thorough review on your manuscript. In order to test whether two variables were independent, we used Pearsons chi-square test of independence and referred to the classification in [21] to define the strength of association. When a manuscript is re-ferred, all reviews and recommendations are sent with the manuscript to the receiving journal. Therefore, in the DBPR case, we can conclude that there is a significant difference between the OTR rate of papers by male corresponding authors and the OTR rate of papers by female corresponding authors. There are several factors that influence the time taken for review, most notably availability of article referees. Any correspondence, queries or additional requests for information on the Manuscript Submission process should be sent to the Natural Product Communications editorial office as follows: [email protected], 614-786-1970. The effects of double-blind versus single-blind reviewing: experimental evidence from The American Economic Review. Locate the submission in Submission Requiring Author Approval or Revisions Requiring Author Approval, and see here for more details. Next steps for publishing your article: What to expect after acceptance, Timescale to publish an article for a Springer journal, Page numbers in a Continuous Article Publishing (CAP) Journal. Nevertheless, the available data allowed us to draw conclusions on the uptake of the review models, as we detail below. Decide and Notify authors of decisions made on articles. What happens after my manuscript is accepted? Sci World J. Controlled experiments as described above were not possible due to peer review policies at the Nature journals and the fact that we could only analyse historical data. Journal-integrated preprint sharing fromSpringer Nature and Research Square, Share your preprint and trackyour manuscripts review progress with ourIn Review service. When the decision is finalized, you will receive a direct email with the overall editorial decision, Editor and/or reviewer comments, and further instructions. As a consequence, we are unable to distinguish bias towards author characteristics or the review model from any quality effect, and thus, we cannot draw definitive conclusions on the efficacy of DBPR in addressing bias. Posted by May 21, 2022 upphittade katter vstervik on jag har avslutat min anstllning autosvar engelska May 21, 2022 upphittade katter vstervik on jag har avslutat min anstllning autosvar engelska Abstract: The abstract not exceeding 150 words and preferably in . Table1 displays the number and proportion of transfers by journal group.

Mahtowa State Park, Oliver Hammond Halle Reum, Thomas Greer Obituary, Graham Eadie Wife, Taurus Horoscope: September 18, 2021, Articles D